Class 1: The Far Right in Europe and Beyond

Introduction to Course

Course Introduction

  • What is ‘far right’?
  • Course structure
  • Learning aims
  • What the course is
  • What the course is not

First task…

Read the syllabus!

  • We have a shiny new (developing) website for the course
  • Before our next meeting, your task is to peruse the website
    • especially the Syllabus, Schedule, and Report example pages.

Defining ‘far right’

  • Broadly: a noun or adjective referring to phenomena that reject (at least elements of) liberalism and/or democracy, and is characterised by nationalism, exclusionism, xenophobia, strong state, welfare chauvinism, traditional ethics, authoritarianism, and/or populism
  • Radical right (populist and non-populist cases): opposition to fundamental values of liberal democracy (radical) and belief in a natural order with inequalities (right)

  • Extreme right: rejection of democracy (Ignazi’s ‘antisystem’—but that depends on the system)

  • far right encompasses both these terms

Publications on radical right (from Arzheimer)

From Arzheimer’s bibliography: https://www.kai-arzheimer.com/tag/bibliography/

Idea of the research field (Arzheimer, 2022)

Wordfish from Arzheimer’s bibliography: Y-axis - how likely the appearance of a word is in research on far right; x-axis - strength of association of a word with underlying dimension

Structure of the course

  • PART I - What is ‘far right’?
    • Concepts
    • Far-right ideology: from transnational traits to local idiosyncrasies
  • PART II - Far-right parties
    • Radical and extreme
    • Representatives
    • Voters
    • Responses and counter-strategies
  • PART III - Far-right movements
    • Movement-parties
    • Mobilisation and movements
    • Counter-mobilisation
    • Demobilisation
  • PART IV - Individuals in far right
    • Radicalisation
    • Violence
    • Online
  • PART V - Studying the far right
    • Methods, ethics, and safety

Initial class poll

Holidays

Several holidays overlap with our class meetings:

  • 1 May (Class 2)
  • 29 May (Class 6)
  • 19 June (Class 9)

FOR NOW, no make-up classes are planned…

  • requires attentive reading and preparation so we can cover the material in the surrounding classes
  • possibly adding short recorded lectures…

Aims

  • knowledge about past and contemporary far-right political and social activity
  • familiarity with breadth of research literature covering the far right
  • Capacity to…
    • assess developments in far-right socio-politics, especially by identifying underlying factors and comparing across contexts
    • critically evaluate research on the far right, especially by evaluating the data and methods used
    • gather, assess, and present data about far-right socio-politics

What the course is

  • A seminar—a big one, but still a seminar
    • very important to read for informed discussion
      • answer specific questions, clarify concepts
      • evaluate research, connect to related empirical material
    • losing my hearing + big room + quiet speaker = ☹
      • so please speak up
    • lengthier discussions → may not cover all slides
    • I will learn your names—but I need your help: participate in discussions
  • If you have a comment related to the discussion, say it! It’s much better than telling me after class

What the course is not…

  • not for activism against the far right
    • it’s a seminar, like many others, with real-world implications
  • not for airing grievances about far right and caricaturing far-right supporters
    • good research on the far right takes seriously its ideology, organisations, and supporters—and tries to divorce analysis from normative commitments
  • not for dogmatic positions about far-right activity
    • we will respectfully debate—and likely disagree at several points—about what qualifies as far right, how it should be researched and understood, and what to do with the fruits of research

Connection to Vorlesung

This seminar is connected to Prof. Dr. Berthold Rittberger’s lecture (Vorlesungsübung: The Political System of the European Union)

  • is everyone enrolled in that?
  • we will tie in Prof. Rittberger’s content through class discussions

Initial class poll

Initial class poll

Prior methods class

Prior analytical software use

Initial class poll

Course assessments

  • Participation
  • Presentation
  • Essay (Data report)

Course assessment

BA main BA minor (60) BA minor (30) Pedagogy Exchange
Participation X X X X X
Presentation X X X (or Exercise) X (or Exercise) X
Essay X X X
Exercise X (or Presentation) X (or Presentation)
Klausur X

Participation

  • do the readings and discuss in class
  • make note of any questions or comments you have as you go through the readings
  • most of the readings are research journal articles
    • more in-depth than book chapters—requires greater concentration
    • consider complementing with a general reader (examples listed in Syllabus)

Presentation (Referat)

  • short (max. 20 mins.) group (3-4 people) presentation on a method
  • groups and date today, topics due to me by Week 4 (15 May)
    • but there are advantages to booking early…

Essay (Hausarbeit): Data report

  • data report on a far-right phenomenon (e.g., voters, a party, protests, violence)
    • why a dataset? Helpful preparation for thinking about validity, reliability, etc. → relevant for quant. and qual.
  • gather and present data, generate analytical insights
  • 2000-3000 words (excluding citations)
  • 28 June: short synopsis due. 16 August: full, final report due.
  • consider working with data visualisation and analysis software!
  • A couple rules: (1) no national-level election data (if you want to study a party/parties, consider EU-level or regional-level or local-level); (2) no drawing any data from or citing Statista or other data curation services.

Course assessment summary

BA main BA minor (60) BA minor (30) Pedagogy Exchange
Participation X X X X X
Presentation X X X (or Exercise) X (or Exercise) X
Essay X X X
Exercise X (or Presentation) X (or Presentation)
Klausur X
  • do the readings and discuss in class
  • make note of any questions or comments you have as you go through the readings
  • most of the readings are research journal articles
    • more in-depth than book chapters—requires greater concentration
    • consider complementing with a general reader (examples listed at of Syllabus)
  • short (max. 20 mins.) group (3-4 people) presentation on a method
  • groups and date today, topics due to me by Week 4 (15 May)
    • but there are advantages to booking early…
  • data report on a far-right phenomenon (e.g., voters, a party, protests, violence)
  • gather and present data, generate analytical insights
  • 2000-3000 words (excluding citations)
  • 28 June: short synopsis due. 16 August: full, final report due.
  • consider working with data visualisation and analysis software!

For the essay and writing in general…

Patriotta, G. (2017). Crafting papers for publication: Novelty and convention in academic writing. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 747-759.

Course practicalities

  • Typical class meeting
  • Office hours and communication
  • e-learning site
  • resources
  • about me
  • Q & A
  • student introductions

Typical class meeting

  • Opening question(s)/discussion point(s)
    • e.g., theoretical dilemma, typology forming, item from the news
  • Summarising lecture on theory/findings related to week’s topic
    • discussion points
  • Short video relevant to topic
  • Discussing the reading(s)
    • highlighting important points (esp. theory and research design)
  • Presentation of further research relevant to week’s topic
  • Summative discussion: takeaways, new ideas, lingering questions

Throughout, we will use cases to link theory to real-world events

Office hours and communication

  • best to send an email
  • 11.00 - 12.00 on Wednesdays at GSI (Oettingenstr. 67) - Room H105
  • or by appointment
  • Please use your LMU email address for communication
    • this is important for the security of the university email system

Moodle

  • Self-enrol: The Far Right in Europe and Beyond

    • access key: “FRpol”
  • All course readings are available

  • But better to look at the new, shiny, developing, purpose-built website:: https://michaelzeller.de/course-fr/

Resources

Kai Arzheimer’s website: https://www.kai-arzheimer.com/ and Twitter: @ kai_arzheimer

Cas Mudde’s podcast, Radikaal: https://www.radikaalpodcast.com/ and his Twitter: @ CasMudde

C-REX: https://www.sv.uio.no/c-rex/english/

Resources

ECPR Extremism & Democracy website: https://standinggroups.ecpr.eu/extremismanddemocracy/

Anti-Defamation League: https://www.adl.org/

and much, much more

About me

  • tell me if you have problems understanding me
    • there’s an accent at work that I tragically cannot shake off
  • Ph.D. in political science from Central European University (CEU)
    • specialisation in qualitative methods (incl. QCA, [Bayesian] process tracing), but also quant. text analysis, network analysis
  • researcher in funded projects on …
    • violent/banned far-right groups and online content moderation
    • radicalisation, violent extremism, polarisation, and resilience
  • current work: militant democracy; far-right activist networks; political violence (in 1970s Northern Ireland; in contemporary Italy); paths to female leadership in Asia; protest and polarisation

About the course

  • Q & A

About you! Student introductions

  • Information about you, possibly including…
    • Expectations for this course
    • favourite joke
    • Study programme
    • favourite song
    • Country (place) of origin
    • top source for news
    • Background in education/research
    • secret skill
    • Academic/professional aspirations

Presentation groups

If presenting required for your course of study, form groups of 3-4.
Tell me your group and top 3 preferred dates:

https://forms.gle/6oRRsp9gaeNtGTSv6

Concept formation

  • concepts are the building blocks of social science research
    • a term denoting an abstract idea

Concept formation

  • identifying bounds of concepts
    • See Sartori (1970)
  • broadly, three types of concepts in social science
  1. classical: all criteria are shared by all cases
  1. radial: some criteria are shared by all cases; others are not
  1. family resemblance: No criterion is shared by all cases

Visualising classical/radial concepts

Classical concept (all criteria)

Radial concept (all share ‘female’)

and family resemblance: no characteristics shared by all (e.g., games)

Classical vs. radial (Collier and Mahon 1993)

Options (according to Mudde)

  1. family resemblance
  1. Weber’s ideal type
  1. Primus inter pares (‘first among equals’): one example that sets the model for all others
  1. lowest common denominator: group on the basis of the (few) features that all individual members have in common. This would lead to a so-called “minimum definition” (cf. Eatwell 1996)
  1. greatest common denominator: a “maximum definition,” maximise possible number of similarities within (part of) the family

Ideological components (maximum definition)

  • nationalism
  • exclusionism
  • xenophobia
  • strong state
  • welfare chauvinism
  • traditional ethics

simplifies

to

  • nativism
  • authoritarianism
  • populism

I will discuss these terms in next week’s slides

Radical and extreme

Again…

Radical right (populist and non-populist cases): opposition to fundamental values of liberal democracy (radical) and belief in a natural order with inequalities (right)

Extreme right: rejection of democracy (Ignazi’s ‘antisystem’—but that depends on the system)

far right encompasses both these terms

Radical and extreme

From: Arzheimer, Kai. “Conceptual Confusion is not Always a Bad Thing: The Curious Case of European Radical Right Studies.” Demokratie und Entscheidung. Eds. Marker, Karl, Michael Roseneck, Annette Schmitt, and Jürgen Sirsch. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2018. 23-40.

Examples?

What cases are you familiar with?

How should we categorise them and why?

Examples - talking through (party) cases

Radical Extreme
AfD Der Flügel?
FPÖ NPD
UKIP? British National Party
RN/Front National Britain First
PiS/United Right Casa Pound
Fidesz Mi Hazánk Mozgalom
FdI, Lega, Forza Italia? Golden Dawn
Partij voor de Vrijheid

even trickier with movements?

Points to be aware of?

  • concept formation
  • measurement
  • methods
  • descriptive vs. causal inference
  • generalisation

Any questions, concerns, feedback for this class?

Anonymous feedback here: https://forms.gle/pisUmtmWdE13zMD58

Alternatively, send me an email: m.zeller@lmu.de

References

Collier, David, and James E. Mahon. 1993. “Conceptual Stretching Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 87 (4): 845–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938818.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” The American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033–53.