Far-right leadership in comparison: shifts and continuities in German-speaking movements

“Worch is the archetypal post-reunification German activist. His concerns are the German ‘Volk’ and addressing grievances like American military bases in Germany. Sellner is a post-9/11 activist, concerned with supposed threats of Islamization. The scope of his activism is transnational and aided by social media and other Internet-based tools.”
leadership
far right
right-wing extremism
Germany
quantitative text analysis

Michael C. Zeller and Fabian Virchow, “Far-right leadership in comparison: shifts and continuities in German-speaking movements,” Social Movement Studies 0, no. 0 (2024): 1-23, doi: 10.1080/14742837.2024.2430974

Authors
Affiliations

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany

Hochschule Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

Published

December 2024

Doi

Abstract

Leadership has long been acknowledged as a crucial feature of social movement activity. Theorisation has delved into the types of leadership and, more recently, the activities performed by leaders. However, comparative research on leadership and detection of any changes over time is scant. Our paper attends to these tasks by looking at the activities of two German-speaking far-right leaders. For many years, Christian Worch was one of the most active and influential neo-Nazi leaders in Germany, communicating much of his activity and strategy in the mid-2000s through a regular circular (Rundbriefe). Similarly, Martin Sellner, both as leader of the Identitarian movement and independent activist, today exercises an outsized role in the German-speaking far-right scene, including through his regular publications in the magazines Compact and Sezession. Our paper uses data of Worch’s and Sellner’s writings, scraped from webpages and gathered from archives, in a mixed-methods comparative design to identify the tasks performed by these leaders, and how frequently. Quantitative text analysis techniques guide the qualitative evaluation of leaders’ activities and reveal shifts – and continuities – in far-right movement leadership. The paper thereby contributes to scholarship on an important aspect of contemporary far-right movements as well as broader social movement literature on the topic of leadership.

Quantitative text analysis corpus

Table 1. Text data descriptive statistics.
Author Source Year No. of Texts Mean Sentences Total Sentences Mean Words Total Words
Worch Rundbriefe 2005 54 35.9 1940 640.4 34580
2006 57 39.2 2235 719.7 41023
2007 46 47.1 2165 791.4 36406
2008 36 41.3 1488 737.2 26538
2009 39 70.7 2757 1286.5 50175
2010 14 45.9 642 754.9 10569
2011 9 28.7 258 475.7 4281
2012 5 63.0 315 1093.8 5469
Sellner Sezession 2015 15 94.1 1411 3429.0 51435
2016 12 92.0 1104 3617.8 43413
2017 14 86.4 1209 3302.6 46237
2018 10 95.7 957 3639.2 36392
2019 12 97.1 1165 3931.7 47180
2020 12 90.0 1079 3728.6 44743
2021 15 80.7 1211 3430.7 51461
2022 10 76.0 760 3339.4 33394
Compact 2016 2 55.0 110 899.0 1798
2017 7 40.0 280 618.7 4331
2018 11 34.9 384 588.5 6474
2019 12 39.4 473 674.5 8094
2020 13 39.6 515 625.5 8132
2021 9 41.7 375 677.4 6097

Article figures

Figure 1. Leadership tasks represented in complete corpuses of Worch (left bar) and Sellner (right bar).

Figure 2. Leadership tasks represented in corpuses of Worch and Sellner by year.

Figure A1. Barplot of topic modeling of Worch Rundbriefe text corpus.

Figure A2. Barplot of topic modeling of Sellner Compact and Sezession text corpuses.

Citation

Add to Zotero

@article{ZellerVirchow2024,
  title={Far-right leadership in comparison: shifts and continuities in German-speaking movements},
  author={Zeller, Michael C and Noschese, Pasquale},
  journal={Social Movement Studies},
  volume={0},
  number={0},
  pages={1-23},
  year={2024},
  publisher={Sage}
}